Get Me Rewrite
More absences, more excuses. A glance at the timestamp on this entry should give you a sense of the problem: I get to the possibility of writing in the blog most evenings when I should most certainly be already riding the escalator to the mezzanine of sleep.
See? The incoherent metaphor -- a sure sign of a brain running out of fuel.
I've also been neglecting the blog because I've been trying, in my hamfisted way, to work on the project. April did not bring forth the profusion of gloriously revised pages it was supposed to. However, it did see a new outline of the whole story, incorporating even some revisionary thoughts I've had in typically inconvenient locations where it's either difficult (subway) or impossible (shower) to capture the fleeting idea before it darts back into the shadows and expires.
In the process, I've come to some significant understanding about how the whole story needs to shift. Mind you, this is a good thing; it really is a change for the better. However, reading over the pages I've already created, and hoped to "revise" in the next phase, I now have to confront the fact that my changes to plot, characters, and atmosphere have been pretty tectonic. There's no hope that the existing prose is anything more now than a well-stocked warehouse full of rags and bones, from which I can take when such fragmentary parts are necessary (suddenly I recall of the flesh-and-bone gun in Cronenberg's ExistenZ, and I also recall that sense of, y'know, ew, that went with it).
Point is, I've got to face something like the Blank Page again. There's nothing for it but to admit that version 2.0 is going to have to be built from the ground up. I am trying to be optimistic about it -- but it's daunting, nevertheless.
Of course, I could just start channeling some unconsicous echoes of works that have inspired me. That's a good way to get started, right? You just have to go back and make sure that you clean up behind yourself.
Comments
Bill:
If you feel that a reading group may help you over certain segments of your work, I think we have several volunteers attached to this website. Of course this all depends on if you think it's at a point where you want to invite criticism. I always found myself strangely appreciative and defensive during reading groups.
Posted by: james
|
April 26, 2006 12:36 PM
Yes, the appreciative/defensive thing is, I think, a common reading-group-response dynamic. On the one hand, the better angels of our nature know that the whole point of the reading group is to get trusted respondents to give you penetrating insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the work.
On the other hand, most of us also not-so-secretly want to be told something like, "This incomplete draft of a novel more or less based on stuff that happened to you in the laundromat last weekend is, perhaps, the first real innovation made with regard to the form since Sterne published The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy. I have given notice at my job, and will be devoting the coming months and years to ensuring that this revelatory text finds its place in the pantheon of cherished literary monuments. Oh, and I've already found you an agent. You're having lunch tomorrow to discuss how to handle movie rights."
Anyway, for the moment I know what I have to do -- knuckle down and re-draft based on the more mature structure and storyline that I've worked out -- before it's worthwhile sharing with folks looking for reader input. But I may solicit the time of interested/masochistic readers here in due course.
Posted by: BT
|
April 27, 2006 07:59 AM
Oh, and I should have said thanks for the kind offer. Which I mean, quite sincerely.
Posted by: BT
|
April 27, 2006 08:00 AM