The Friday Quiz: No Whispering
It's depressing to think that we've been reduced to little more than the Friday Quiz these days -- and sometimes, not even that. I had hoped by now to give you a review of Joe Miller's forthcoming Cross-X, plus an inquiry into the origins of artificial lemon-lime flavor, and a manifesto conclusively establishing walkie-talkie phones are the Last Goddamn Straw. Oh, and new pictures of Helena.
Pretty bad. I'd promise all those thing and more in the near future. But you know -- oh, how you know -- what the promises of a wombat are worth. It oughta be a proverb.
At least Rory's back. Welcome back, Rory!
All that flailing aside, there really is a quiz today. Read, solve, and dismiss us for the purveyors of discardable distraction that we are. Herewith our almost-weekly noggin-squasher:
Swedish emigrant Alexander Samuelsson came to the U.S. in the 1880s, and in 1915 was employed in an industrial job in Terre Haute, Indiana that built on his original profession. Asked for an innovative design for a product's package, he decided to turn to the forms of the natural world for inspiration, attempting to draw upon the appearances in nature of two things used in making the product. However, Samuelsson is said to have looked at the wrong page in the Encyclopedia Britannica as a reference. As a result, his design -- now famous -- is based on an organism that has nothing to do with the product in question.
What is the product Samuelsson was asked to help package? For a bonus point, what was the organism he mistakenly referenced?
First correct answer posted to comments wins a anklet made of sun-dried sea lice, lovingly hand-crafted by the family of Capt. Obed Marsh of the Innsmouth Ecological Preservation Institute. No Googling or hiring the Dog Whisperer. That guy is great with dogs, but the quiz is not your dog. It's not anybody's dog. One guess per comment, but you may comment as often as you like.
Comments
Toblerone and Lithium molecule
Posted by: james
|
June 2, 2006 09:34 AM
There is an alternate universe where, delightfully, that is the correct answer. But you wouldn't want to live there, because by U.S. law, everyone has to wear coulats.
Posted by: BT
|
June 2, 2006 10:24 AM
Swedish fish and kippers.
Posted by: boxjam
|
June 2, 2006 12:43 PM
Quicker Oats
Posted by: herbivorous
|
June 2, 2006 01:14 PM
That 'cork that's shaped like a sponge' package
Posted by: boxjam
|
June 2, 2006 02:31 PM
...because there's lots of sea-harvesting industry in Terre Haute
Posted by: boxjam
|
June 2, 2006 02:32 PM
Some clues: You have, in all likelihood, consumed the product.
Posted by: BT
|
June 2, 2006 02:48 PM
What a great question, but I have no idea. Coca cola bottles and kelp?
And thanks for the shout-out. Hey, at least you have the Friday quiz - right now, I got nothin'!
Posted by: Rory
|
June 2, 2006 07:05 PM
i wanna be wombat's dog, but i'm stumped (after wracking my brain trying to come up with longlost bizarre American food packages). I'll say Gummi Worms or Gummi Bears (just plain anything Gummi really).
Posted by: art
|
June 3, 2006 04:01 AM
Gateway computers/Guernsey cow.
Posted by: herbivorous
|
June 3, 2006 09:59 AM
Rice Krispies/Krishna
Posted by: herbivorous
|
June 3, 2006 09:59 AM
Scotch tape/chambered nautilus
Posted by: Jonathan
|
June 3, 2006 01:20 PM
yum yum yum, tape!
Posted by: art
|
June 3, 2006 09:11 PM
Candy Canes? (confusing sugar cane and the walking stick?)
Posted by: art
|
June 3, 2006 09:16 PM
by the way, they're called "rice bubbles" here
Posted by: art
|
June 3, 2006 09:17 PM
>>yum yum yum, tape!
The kids at my daughter's school eat at lunch a mutant descendent of fruit rollups, a cross between masking tape and cotton candy. Sweden being home to only lingonberries after that fallout with the Finns, I'll take art's hint that this is not a 'fruitful' avenue of inquiry, but I fail to see how 'rice bubbles' could adhere to anything.
With regard to not being
anybody's dog,
there's a lot of that going
around.
Bob Hope/Strom Thurmond, just so nobody else has to say it.
Posted by: Jonathan
|
June 4, 2006 12:16 AM
Rory takes the main question - it's the "classic" coca-cola bottle that we were on about. The botanicals he was aiming for were the coca leaf and the kola nut. However, he supposedly looked up "cocoa" instead, and so the undulated ridged shape is evocative of the wrong plant...
Sorry I'm so long getting to this. I will shortly point my excellent excuse for just that. Update tomorrow.
Posted by: BT
|
June 5, 2006 12:06 AM
That's great, but can I skip the sea lice? That picture gives me cold sweats.
Posted by: Rory
|
June 5, 2006 08:27 PM
ehhhh, I don't mean to sound like a no-it-all here, but...
first of all, Alexander Samuelsson did not design or invent the famous contour Coca-Cola bottle. Yes, his name was on the patent, naming him as the inventor. But if you knew how the company dealt with patents, you would know that they never put the actual designer on the patent. In the case of the Root Glass Company, Chapman J. Root in almost every case put his son's name on the companies bottle patents. Why he did this...no one is sure. Ironically, out of the four people who were part of the bottle project, Samuelsson had the least to do with it. Samuelsson was not hire on as a bottle designer. He was the plant superintendent. Chapman's decision to put Samuelsson's name on the patent has caused the true designer to not get the recognition he deserved. Rumor has it that Samuelson was never even a glass-blower, but a blacksmith. The actual designer of the bottle was my grandfather, Earl R. Dean. Google his name with quotes and see for yourself. Also, the answer to your quiz wasn't completely accurate. It was the "cocoa pod" that inspired my grandfather. And yes, Cocoa is not an ingredient of Coca-Cola. But if they would have figured it out sooner, Hershey's, Neslies or Carnation Chocolate milk would have probably acquired the famous package...lol.
So...where's my anklet made of sun-dried sea lice, lovingly hand-crafted by the family of Capt. Obed Marsh of the Innsmouth Ecological Preservation Institute? ;)
Oh yeah, in case anyone cares and wonder how I know all this stuff...I'm the grandson of Earl R. Dean.
Posted by: GavinMacQueen
|
April 8, 2007 01:07 AM