The Friday Quiz: The Sundback Continuum
I'm going to get right down to today's quiz here, but stay tuned for details about the mighty Quizvitational -- the multiweek, annual trivia event that would not resign. Even though it lost the war long, long ago.
Now, on to the business at hand -- this week's attempt to "take back" the brain by the Know-Nothing Party.*
Born in Sweden, Gideon Sundback contributed his most enduring creation to the world in 1913 in Canada, later perfecting it in the U.S. The name it later took was actually the name of a product introduced in 1923 by B.F. Goodrich, which used the invention. In 1932, George G. Blaisdell founded a manufacturing company to create an entirely unrelated product. Although it did not draw on Sundback's invention, Blaisdell liked the name Goodrich had coined. He named his company a slight variation on the name of Goodrich's product; the company and it maintains the name today.
What was the name of Goodrich's product? For a bonus point, what did Blaisdell manufacture?
First correct answer posted to comments wins a collection of vintage qualifiers, double negatives and circular statements left behind at the Pentagon by a departing Donald Rumsfeld. No Googling, and there will be no recounts. One guess per comment, but comment as often as you like.
*Our playful use of "Know-Nothing" in the above preamble should not be taken to suggest any ideological sympathy or political connection with a bunch of mid-nineteenth century bigots and Pope-o-phobics. (Although, sometimes we do find the Pope a little scary.)
Comments
Match Game
uh, no wait, that's Mark Goodrich (and Bill Todman?)
Posted by: art
|
November 10, 2006 03:09 AM
Are we talking about the humble toaster?
OK, I thought not. Just wanted a pop tart -- they don't make them down under. They aren't good for you anyway.
Posted by: art
|
November 10, 2006 03:17 AM
what? no clues at 3AM? come on, wombat!
Posted by: art
|
November 10, 2006 03:21 AM
boxjam reads question.
understands 'bf goodrich' and nothing else.
well, canada.
but how useful is that?
guesses rubber cement.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 10, 2006 04:20 AM
My second guess is the glue gun.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 10, 2006 09:00 AM
OK, just to paraphrase my confusing question: World-wandering Swede invents something big; Goodrich incorporates in a product, and names that product something catchy. That product's name comes to stand for the Swede's invention.
Then a second guy comes along and sets up a business making a completely unrelated product. He likes the name coined by Goodrich, so he tweaks it slightly and uses the name for his own product. That name is still in use.
The name Goodrich came up with is also widely used, but has evolved into a generic, rather than brand name.
And nobody's right.
Posted by: BT
|
November 10, 2006 10:32 AM
Steel-belted radial.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 10, 2006 02:34 PM
Pie.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 10, 2006 02:35 PM
Now you're just being silly.
The modern "pie" was invented in 1946. (Earlier references to "pie", of course, referred to what is now known as a "lo-cal smoothie.)
Posted by: BT
|
November 10, 2006 03:03 PM
Boxjam's got me on a glue binge. Heh.
Epoxy?
Posted by: herbivorous
|
November 10, 2006 03:26 PM
No. I'll give you one more hint: Goodrich's product, which spawned the name later applied to the invention, was footwear.
Posted by: BT
|
November 10, 2006 05:32 PM
The only brand name that people use in lieu of a generic name seems to be Kleenex. (Except in the South USA where they call all soft drinks "coke" but I simply consider them crazy).
Posted by: art
|
November 10, 2006 05:36 PM
OK, ugg-boot? (there seems to be some kind of controversy over whether these are an Australian invention or not).
Posted by: art
|
November 10, 2006 05:39 PM
Doc Marten's?
Posted by: art
|
November 10, 2006 05:41 PM
Galoshes sounds almost Swedish enough.
Posted by: Jonathan
|
November 10, 2006 06:16 PM
Yeah, galoshes do sound stupid enough. And rubbery enough to be a Goodrich-synergy leveragization.
I'm going to just assume that's the right answer and move on to the bonus question. Blaisdell's product/company is Oshkosh b'Gosh, from which the town of Oshkosh, Wisconsin back-formed its name.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 10, 2006 06:22 PM
Blaisdell invented baba ganoush.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 10, 2006 06:23 PM
garoche.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 10, 2006 06:24 PM
scaramouche.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 10, 2006 06:24 PM
Nothing yet. I'll give you one more clue -- the invention to which Goodrich's product wind up lending a name is found in many places now, and not just on -- indeed, not primarily on -- footwear.
Posted by: BT
|
November 11, 2006 10:53 AM
Art, there are lots of brand names other than kleenex that people use in lieu of the generic. Here are a few (and forgive me if I am missing a joke -- copy editors are prone to that):
aspirin
scotch tape
dumpster
realtor
tampon
laundromat
q-tip
brassiere
escalator
styrofoam
cellophane
kerosene
band aid
chapstick
super glue
jello
brillo pad
jeep
ping pong
plexiglass
fiberglass
microchip
mace
rollerblade
yo-yo
jacuzzi
x-acto knife
xerox
thermos
granola
kitty litter
vaseline
zipper
three recent ones:
post-it note
walkman
ipod
There are tons more.
Posted by: Scraps
|
November 11, 2006 01:28 PM
zipper is probably the right answer, huh?
And Blaisdell made zippo lighters.
Posted by: boxjam
|
November 11, 2006 02:03 PM
Thanks, Scraps--
No joke, I just didn't spend much time thinking about it. But now that you have, it occurs to me that some of these products are the very ones that are called differently here in Oz (e.g., jelly instead of jello, which is very confusing). But USA's economic imperialism makes this an increasingly minor problem (!)
Posted by: art
|
November 11, 2006 05:49 PM
Scraps alley-oops to Boxjam for the dunk. The boot was called the Zipper, and that's what Sundback (I think, by the way, there's an umlaut in there somewhere) invented. And, of course, the Zippo followed. Blaisdell even thought that the sound of the Zippo's lighting mechanism was reminiscent of that of a zipper. I think that's a bit of a stretch, but as a nonsmoker, perhaps I haven't listened closely enough...
Posted by: lewombat
|
November 12, 2006 01:41 PM