" /> The Wombat File Is Yours to Keep: February 2008 Archives

« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 29, 2008

The Friday Quiz: That's Entertainment

Two questions for your immediate and ruthless dispatch today, both tenuously and pointlessly linked by their actorly content:


On April 2, 1891, the English newspaper the St. James Gazette noted the accidental death of an actor from loss of blood. What had happened, and what famous role had the actor been playing?

What performer was offered the lead in an unlikely 1976 ABC sitcom called Our Man in a Rataan, about a reporter working in an isolated outpost in North Africa? The plans for the show fell apart when, in a meeting with Michael Eisner (then ABC's programming head), Eisner asked "Where do you see this character in three years?" and the actor answered "Suicide."

First correct answer posted to comments wins a Rataan sofa, sagging in the middle but perfect to adorn your never-used side porch. No Googling or sauntering over to your climate-controlled archive of 19th-century periodicals. One guess per comment but feel free to let those comments know who is boss of the comments (hint: it's you!)

February 28, 2008

New Favorite Book Cover

The Ab Revolution

The secret of the Ab Revolution? Helpin' Handz(tm) technology which knead your belly muscles into six-pack shape, while you relax in a comfortable undershirt.

February 27, 2008

The Answer...

...to last week's quiz was "Oregon." The poem is Thanatopsis.

February 22, 2008

The Friday Quiz: A Question of Origins

Far away from our usual haunts today, the Wombat will be only able to check in on your progress from time to time. But nevertheless, here's today's lame-ass attempt to amuse and bemuse:

The earliest recorded use of this proper name was in a 1765 petition by one Robert Rogers to the Kingdom of Great Britain, asking for money. The following year, a man named Jonathan Carver, working from a commission given to him by Rogers, used the name in his account of his labors. It shows up half a century later in a famous narrative poem, and it was that use which helped establish in regular usage, and ushered it on to its increasingly official and legitimate life.

Some scholars of its origin(i.e., where Rogers picked it up) suggest a mis-transcription of an early French attempt to spell the local name of the Wisconsin river; this has gained more credence than the suggestion that it is the corruption of the French for "hurricane." Another, more recent theory advanced is that Rogers used one of two similar-sounding Algonquian words, both meaning essentially "good and beautiful."

What is the name, still in official use today? For a bonus point, what was the famous poem?

First correct answer posted to comments gets a very poor digital image of the recent lunar eclipse, marred in particular by an unfortunately placed streetlamp. No Googling or casting your shadow on the surface of the moon, a feat impressive but useless for the generation of witty and entertaining comments. Comment as often as the will to comment lives on in your upright and commentful soul, yet give forth with only one answer per comment, lest your comments as a whole be seen to be corrupted and cast into the pit of unrighteous comments.

February 15, 2008

The Friday Quiz: The Aqueduct of Sylvius plus Heston equals Entertainment

Not really. But I needed some kind of headline for this hopelessly ill-assorted array. Three (or four, sort of) brain-pesterers for a hurried Friday. To wit:

  1. What does "boustrophedonic" writing do?
  2. The No. 1 fiction bestseller of 1961 was written after the author had apprenticed himself in the craft that made his (real) historical subject famous, and had over 400 of his subject’s letters translated. The book was later adapted into a film starring Charlton Heston. Who was the novel based on, and (for a bonus) what was its title?
  3. Where are Monro's holes, the aqueduct of Sylvius and the field of Forel located?

First correct answer to each posted to comments wins a sample-sized tin of forehead polish, to give you the gleam of Success. No Googling or actually doing anything boustrophedonically. One guess per comment but comment with shocking abandon.

February 11, 2008

Ten Great Books You Haven't (Probably) Read*

*If, that is, you're in the category of "most people I run into."

All of these were published in the 20th century, or just after. I'm not well-read enough to imagine I know about more great classic books than you probably do. But these -- while I'm guessing you've heard of most, I have the feeling that for most readers at least several here will be unknown territory. No links -- you can decide where to buy 'em. In no particular order:

Michel Faber, Under the Skin: Not so much for the (wonderful) creepitude, or the various levels of social satire, as for the fascinating mental exercise of imagining what kind of place Isserly is from.

C.P. Snow, The Masters: A shamefully neglected writer, at least in the U.S. The quietly-carried-out election of a new "master" (something between a Dean of faculty and a president of a college) at a midcentury Oxbridge college turns out to be utterly riveting. Also good, from the same series: The Affair.

Tom Carson, Gilligan's Wake: This is a bit unfair as a choice, as I've become slightly acquainted, at least via email, with the guy. But this is a novel that has both heroin-shooting with Daisy Buchanan and Russell Johnson morphing into Godzilla in D.C. What have you got to lose?

Ishmael Reed, Mumbo-Jumbo: Something of a jazz novel, something of an extended dream-poem narrative, with experiments in typography, something of a conspiracy theory about the forces of repression wanting to quash the viral growth of ragtime and black culture in general. Funny and hallucinatory but always retains a curious intensity and focus. One of the finds that made grad school absolutely fucking worth it.

Donald E. Westlake, God Save the Mark: Picked more as an example of Westlake's nearly-unique way with the comic crime novel than as a surefire vote for best-of-his-oevre. As a thirteen-year-old hiding out in his local library from the emotional wasteland of junior high, I found Westlake, like Douglas Adams, a salve for the the soul. This is the one I started with, and why shouldn't you?

Allan Hollinghurst, The Swimming Pool Library: There are not that many books about which one could say both "It's sort of wall-to-wall sex," really, and "it's exquisitely written."

John Ellis, The Social History of the Machine Gun: Gets a bit technical, but it's brief and delivers absolutely what it promises. Why automatic weapons and brutal colonialism go hand in hand; or hand-on-trigger.

Antonia White, Beyond the Glass: A treatment of love and madness that will stay with you. Another British writer who's not well-known enough in the U.S.

Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea, The Illuminatus Trilogy: Silly, overwrought, too long, and of mixed quality in terms of its prose, humor, and level of philosophical insight. Half a prank and half a stoned ramble. Still a jaw-droppingly effective transmission of almost everything good about mysticism and esoteric culture, delivered with humility, outrage, and a profound sense of humor about itself. Bonus: makes Ayn Rand laughable on a permanent basis.

David Quammen, Monster of God: A book about the big carnivores that still walk the earth (bears, lions, crocs, and tigers, to be precise), and (more importantly), their relationships with the peoples who live in regular contact with them, and who in many cases are among the world's poorest.

There. Now it's your turn. Please supply at least five in the comments (or elsewhere, and give us a link).

February 08, 2008

The Friday Quiz: Old Answer, New Question

The unanswered part of last week's question: The 1956 Democratic Presidential debate was between Adlai Stevenson (the eventual nominee) and progressive Senator Estes Kefauver -- who went on to run for V.P. on the ticket with Stevenson.

Here's this week's crown-breaker:

In 1920, Jake Hamon was shot by Clara Hamon, his mistress of ten years (they were never married, but he had arranged for Clara to marry his nephew in order that they would share a surname), in the Randal Hotel in Ardmore, Oklahoma. The apparent motive was his recent news to her that he would be leaving her. After she shot Jake (hitting him in the liver), he left for a local medical facility, assuring her that he would say it was an accident -- but he died several days later. After he left, she took a document from his luggage which spelled out that an important position that had been promised to Jake would only be his if he would leave Clara and return to his wife (who was related, by marriage, to the letter's sender.) The sender is reported to have cried when he heard the news of Jake's death, saying "What a wonderful fellow he was. Too bad that he had to be taken out. Too bad that he had that one fault -- that admiration for women." Clara pled self-defense and was acquitted in what was remarked on as an astonishingly speedy trial.

Who was the sender of the letter? For a bonus: what is the name of the series of less violent events to which this murder was connected?

First correct answer posted to comments wins a Kefauver coon skin cap. No Googling or arranging a marriage for your nephew for any reason whatsoever. Just leave him out of your crazy scheme, OK? God damn it, the boy's got a tough enough time as it is, what with that funny walk of his. People think he's Belgian or some such. Anyway, one answer to each part of the question per comment but I'll defend to the death your right to comment as often as you like.