April 29, 2002
Bibliographical Bonuses

We spent the day at the office constructing lists of the Literary Works of the Great and Near-Great; thus, we had occasion to search-engine ourselves silly in pursuit of various bits and pieces of information. In our more-or-less purposeful meanderings, we happened across a few things you might desire a gander at, viz:

1. The Centaurian, the website devoted to All Things Updikean; in a peculiar form of tribute to the writer's lyricism and subtle command of description, the site is as deliberately ugly and unsubtle as a ninety-nine cent store. Headline after headline, brought to you in many a screaming color, providing the lowdown on all that goes on in the fast-paced world of Updike studies & fandom.

Professor Yerkes (the Chief Centaurian) has collected some great photos -- man, that Young Updike knew he was the shit.

2. Can't get enough of that Old-Tyme Wombat File Quiz Goodness?. Hooked on factoids like the patent date of the the Underwear Steamer? Strain your brain Gilded-Age-style with the Mark Twain Memory Builder.

3. There's nothing special about the ad-clogged Isaac Bashevis Singer bibliography on this page, but what happens after you leave it is noteworthy; those curious should open the page and then close it again; when you do, you see a typical schlocky pop-up ad -- and a surprising pop-under message from an organization that wants your help in an important cause.

Posted by BT at April 29, 2002 11:54 PM
Comments

**crickets**

Well, at least I know what doesn't inspire discussion. John Updike=absolute silence.

Posted by: BT on May 1, 2002 11:04 PM

Hey, at least he didn't pinch your Orwell/Amis comparison.

I must embarrassedly admit to never having read any Updike.

Posted by: Rory on May 2, 2002 04:18 AM

Can we hijack it into a discussion of the unfair association of crickets with silence and/or boredom? Or how good they taste dunked in chocolate?

My parents had an Updike book, I believe Couples. I read the dirty parts.

Posted by: hackly fracture on May 2, 2002 02:41 PM

I saw "Witches of Eastwick."

So I'm something of an Updike expert.

Posted by: teenidol on May 2, 2002 04:12 PM

That's an Updike? That changes everything. So was Rabbit played by Jack Nicholson or Anjelica Huston?

By the way, speaking of John Updike links, you can hum the words 'Updike URL' to a tune by a certain Mr Joel.

*crickets*

Posted by: Rory on May 2, 2002 06:18 PM

It is really very wrong to invoke any late-career Billy Joel songs at any time, on the grounds that the result may be that other people are then infected with the BJLCTV (Late Career Tune Virus) which, in serious cases, has caused people to throw themselves in front of traffic to stop the inner loop of fake doo-wop or mawkish paeans to Vietnam trauma.

Now, back to subject at hand -- what would really be good would be crickets soaked in brandy, and then dunked in chocolate.

Posted by: BT on May 2, 2002 08:47 PM

I am an innocent man.

Posted by: Rory on May 3, 2002 05:58 AM