Since the media is all awash this week with Kerry's decision to go with John "Dreamboat" Edwards, we thought it would be a good time to unleash a Vice-Presidential question for the many political-history lovers in the audience. See if you can follow the convolutions behind this week's head-softener:
In the 20th century Since 1928, only four Vice-Presidential nominees from the Democratic party or the G.O.P. have had no experience serving in Congress. The list includes McGovern running mate Sargent Shriver, Henry Wallace (FDR's veep in 1940, dropped for Truman in 1944), and Spiro Agnew. The fourth nominee is not widely remembered as a vice-presidential candidate, but well known for another role.
Who is the fourth figure on this list? Bonus: who was the Presidential nominee with whom he ran?
The first correct answer posted to comments wins a copy of Ric Flair's To Be the Man. No Googling or calling up Dick Cheney's Party Bunker. One guess per comment, please, but you may comment as often as you like.
Posted by BT at July 09, 2004 09:03 AMYou're just trying to freeze out the Tasmanian-based-in-Scotland contestants, aren't you?
Nic O'Teen. Running mate to the Prez.
http://newkadia.safeshopper.com/1328/58467.htm?187
Posted by: Rory on July 9, 2004 10:32 AMNot at all, Rory. Going by past performance, globetrotting Tasmanians are favored contenders in the American history category.
That's an amazing-looking volume, by the way. I like his "you had your chance" message to the people.
Posted by: BT on July 9, 2004 10:44 AMTeddy Roosevelt?
Posted by: Gavin on July 9, 2004 10:44 AMRockefeller - running with Gerald Ford.
Posted by: boxjam on July 9, 2004 10:53 AMI think Rocky served as VP after Nixon's resignation, but Dole was actually Ford's VP candidate in '76.
MacArthur?
Posted by: Gavin on July 9, 2004 10:58 AMGavin's guess caused me to realize that I made a vital typo in formulating the original question. TR doesn't make the cut on a technicality -- he was the veep nominee in 1900, which is by many lights in the 19th century. Point is, my original formulation was more specific, limiting the question to nominees since 1928. But in putting the question together late last night, I forgot about the date-specific cutoff and wrote "in the 20th century." Apologies.
On to Nelson Rockefeller -- Gavin is correct, he was never his party's VP nominee. Dole ran with Ford in 1976.
To be clearer -- the man we are seeking ran for V.P. in a post-1928 election, never served in Congress, and left his mark on history in another capacity entirely.
Posted by: BT on July 9, 2004 11:06 AMMacArthur enjoyed a brief wave of public support for a Presidential run after Truman relieved him of his Korean command in 1951. But then there were Congressional hearings that involved him and that seems to have pulled the rug out from under any dreams of running for the White House MacArthur might have had. He didn't run, and basically retired from public life.
Posted by: BT on July 9, 2004 11:18 AMIt's also in the twentieth century by many lights!
I demand a share of the prize! Maybe the dustcover, or the glossy photo insert of Ric Flair's greatest foes.
Posted by: Gavin on July 9, 2004 11:21 AMNixon?
Posted by: Jonathan on July 9, 2004 11:23 AMI feel your pain, Gavin. How about a slightly damaged CD single of "I Want to be a Hulkamaniac" from Hulk Hogan and the Wrestling Boot Band?
Jonathan, your guess is well off -- Nixon made his name politically with his vigorous attacks on pinkos while serving in both the House and the Senate.
Posted by: BT on July 9, 2004 11:28 AMI couldn't remember what he had done before being Ike's VP other than governor of California. Sold shoes, I thought. And I admit that "left his mark on history in another capacity entirely" would seem to point to someone else.
Makes me wonder who was Goldwater's running mate.
Posted by: Jonathan on July 9, 2004 11:34 AMGoldwater ran with William Miller, a New York congressman and the RNC chairman at the time. Apparently it was his reputation for political hardball that got him selected. Which is odd -- one would have thought that Barry himself would have embodied all the necessary toughness.
Posted by: BT on July 9, 2004 11:37 AMI'll go, then, with George Marshall, whom Bill loves.
Posted by: boxjam on July 9, 2004 12:08 PMLove Marshall though I do, he never ran for elective office in his entire career.
Posted by: BT on July 9, 2004 12:17 PMI have two possible guesses, neither of which will be correct. The first is that old lovable CIA director, George H. W. Bush...
Posted by: KF on July 9, 2004 12:27 PM...and the second is Eisenhower.
Posted by: KF on July 9, 2004 12:28 PMBush 41 was a two-term congressman from Texas before he went on to a bunch of appointee positions, running alongside Reagan in 1980 after losing the nomination for President.
Eisenhower never ran as a vice-presidential candidate -- he was drafted by the GOP to run for President without ever considering the No. 2 job.
One more point of clarification: the person in question was never elected Vice-President or President.
Posted by: BT on July 9, 2004 12:33 PMAnd it was a Democratic or Republican ticket, which rules out Adm. James Stockdale and Ru Paul.
Posted by: Jonathan on July 9, 2004 12:38 PMOh, damn. I was just about to guess Stockdale.
Posted by: KF on July 9, 2004 12:41 PMCluesville: his legacy is in his work in an appointed position.
Also, he was a Republican.
Posted by: BT on July 9, 2004 12:43 PM"Bricker defeats Barkley": headline from basketball or alternate history?
Drug Czar Bill "Big Money" Bennett?
Posted by: teenidol on July 9, 2004 01:00 PMVP nominee on a losing Republican ticket since 1928; this puts us before Goldwater, to Dewey's running mate or one of FDR's opponents, and yet why would an opponent of FDR get appointed to something, unless it was UN Rep?
It ain't Pat Paulin.
J. Edgar Hoover
Posted by: Jonathan on July 9, 2004 01:10 PMIf not George Marsall, maybe Gary Marshall.
Damn, I was trying to find an article I read yesterday that linked to celebrities' political donations when I found the answer to your question.
I'm out.
Posted by: teenidol on July 9, 2004 01:11 PM"...and yet why would an opponent of FDR get appointed to something, unless it was UN Rep?"
He didn't say it was a presidentially-appointed position. He didn't even say it was a government position. And he didn't say the appointment happened during the administration he lost to.
Notwithstanding the above, Al Haig.
Posted by: boxjam on July 9, 2004 01:43 PMYeah, I think you're right, boxjam. I got distracted with Rockefeller, who was appointed to VP but didn't run with Ford in 1972.
Posted by: Jonathan on July 9, 2004 01:58 PMIt makes this:
>One more point of clarification:
>the person in question was never
>elected Vice-President or President
a particularly sweet clue.
Posted by: Scraps on July 9, 2004 02:05 PMExcept, when was Haig the vp candidate?
Posted by: Scraps on July 9, 2004 02:08 PMJust because the day is getting on, I'll note that it was a Presidentially appointed position in which the man we seek made his lasting fame.
And to the best of my knowledge, Haig was never nominated for V.P. He did have a momentary delusion that he was No. 3 in succession as Secretary of State. But that's not quite the same thing.
"I'm in charge here!"
Hmm. Given the wombat's predilections for tying history to current events, he's leading us to a CIA director.
William Casey?
Posted by: Jonathan on July 9, 2004 04:23 PMNot Kissinger?
Posted by: Gavin on July 9, 2004 04:56 PMOr J. Edgar Hoover?
Posted by: Gavin on July 9, 2004 04:56 PMFor the first time ever, I have pre-googled. So I'm out. But it's a good one.
Posted by: KF on July 9, 2004 05:16 PMwhat, the quiz is still on?
C. Everett Koop (or was it Coop)?
Posted by: art on July 10, 2004 04:47 AMSorry I couldn't follow up sooner, but I got busy with child care yesterday afternoon and Saturday has a way of getting away from me.
So, as we go into overtime, a few more clues: he has something in common, sort of, with Richard Gephardt, although in his case a major newspaper erroneously reported that he had been elected v-p, rather than merely chosen by one of the nominees as a running mate.
Secondly, his last elective job was as Governor of a large state. But in his eventual appointive position he did stuff that makes him a more historically prominent figure.
I'm quite sorry that I began this quiz with one of my usual bonehead mistakes in formulating the question, as I'm pleased to have stumped you all so far (Not that I stumped Gavin w/r/t the question as it appeared yesterday morning. But even if he must be credited with the real win and our speculation here is merely an afterthought, I'm proud to have led the chase for this long anyway.)
By the way, I presume that Scott is on vacation? No Alf votes yet...
Posted by: BT on July 10, 2004 04:28 PMOkay, well the bonus points are low-hanging fruit at this point: this was Dewey's VP candidate.
The actual man himself? I guess Earl Warren, later of the Supremes (along with Flo Ballard and Cindy Birdsong.
Posted by: Gavin on July 11, 2004 01:09 AM)
Posted by: Gavin on July 11, 2004 01:09 AMGavin scores a karmically-justified victory: Earl Warren, former California governor*, ran with Dewey in '48. They lost, of course, to Truman (and Kentucky Senator Alben Barkeley).
In 1953, Eisenhower appointed Warren Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and his leadership of the court in groundbreaking civil rights decisions inflamed conservatives, who felt betrayed. Heh.
Of course, there was also the Warren commission...
Thanks to all for sticking with a long-drawn-out quiz this week.
Incidentally, on the last two Fridays in August I will be out of town and unavailable to run the quiz. Anyone with an interest in dog-day quizmastering should let me know.
*During which service he presided over the internment of Japanese-Americans in camps. The irony of his later role as a prime mover of civil rights reform was not lost on the man himself, who had the good grace in his memoirs to regret his part in such a blot on U.S. history.
Posted by: BT on July 11, 2004 01:18 PMDamn, for some reason I remembered Dewey's running mate as John W. Bricker. I think he served in Congress, anyway.
Posted by: Scraps on July 11, 2004 02:42 PMSorry, yes, I was off in the woods, doing manly things like making fires, drinking cheap Irish whiskey, and discussing the virtues of various pieces of pricey camping gear with my wife.
On Saturday, in steady rain, we hiked to a historic firetower on the Va./W.Va border with a stunning view of the surrounding area (natch.)
Usually. On Saturday, the view was like that from the inside of a glass of milk. Maybe a glass that has a forest scene printed on the outside, as some dim tree shapes were visible in the shifting fog. It all would have been OK if there had been a Starbucks up there. Fancy hiking to the only GPS coords remaining in the lower 48 without a Starbucks.
Anyhow, sorry to have made you all wait:
Norman Fell.
Posted by: Scott on July 12, 2004 11:53 AMI always thought it would have been cool to have an verb or adverb as a surname. It just occured to me that Normal Fell is a case in point. Eric Quick was a great DJ name. Is that how he spelled it?
Posted by: teenidol on July 12, 2004 04:25 PMI don't remember his first name, but I have records by DJ Quik.
Posted by: Gavin on July 13, 2004 11:53 AM