May 27, 2005
The Friday Quiz: Transplant

Oh, I know. You're getting ready for the three-day weekend. Soaking wood in gasoline and slathering Mrs. Bell's seasoning all over the tofu faux-pig. Loading the hang glider into your brother-in-law's Ford Expedition, or heading down to the VFW with your diorama of the Siege of Noriega's Palace.

But you've got time for a little quiz before your first Mai Tai of the weekend, right?

In the 1760s, Nathan Aspinwall persuaded the colonial legislature of Connecticut to pass an act paying ten shillings bounty for every one hundred of these cultivated. By 1800, it is estimated that more than half of the homes in Aspinwall's native town of Mansfied were using its products in a home-based industry.

In 1830, a new variety was introduced from Asia. It was touted as highly superior to the common kind, and its appearance touched off a wild round of speculation by investors. In 1834, one-year-olds sold for $3-$5 per hundred, but soon the price rocketed to $500 per hundred, and in one case prices rose to $100 a piece.

However, this price escalation made their value greater than that of the end-product of the industry in which they were used. By 1840 the market had crashed, wiping out speculators, and a round of disease followed, which spelled the end for the industry that depended on this item -- never very economically competitive in America -- in the U.S.

What were the items in question? For a bonus point, what famous non-U.S. residence includes the site of a major attempt to cultivate them on a large scale?

First correct answer posted to comments wins a rare William-Conrad-as-Nero-Wolfe bobblehead doll. No Googling or searching the archives of Ye Colonial Gawkere. One guess per comment, please, but you may comment as often as you like.

Posted by BT at May 27, 2005 08:07 AM
Comments

And the first hour is always spent figuring out what you're asking...

tulips.

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 10:01 AM

Half the fun of the quiz is in the deciphering.

Um, isn't it?

Oh well...anyway, nope, it's not tulips. That much more famous speculative mania preceded the one we're talking about.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 10:41 AM

Rubber-tree plants.

Posted by: Rory on May 27, 2005 11:14 AM

(He tried to shift it, but everyone knows he can't.)

Umm... hemp.

Posted by: Rory on May 27, 2005 11:16 AM

Flax.

Posted by: Rory on May 27, 2005 11:17 AM

As I recall, the siege was not of Noriega's palace, but of the Papal Nuncio, in which the Defenders of Freedom in the Western Hemisphere put the squeeze on the Panamanian strongman by blasting the place with Queensreich. Go ahead, let your chest swell with pride.

Um, hemp?

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 11:18 AM

From Asia... erm... durian? Durian liquor was big in them there olden days, I hear.

Posted by: Rory on May 27, 2005 11:19 AM

Jute. (Hey, juuuute... don't make a mattt...)

Posted by: Rory on May 27, 2005 11:21 AM

cran-apples

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 11:29 AM

Despite the medley of musical answers from Rory, nobody's scored yet.

One interesting note: James I tried to foster the industry for which this item is essential in colonial Virginia, back in the early 17th century, but when the colonists figured out that tobacco was a much more profitable crop, the idea was pretty much abandoned.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 11:31 AM

Silk worms.

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 11:34 AM

Boxjam: close, but no Virginia-tobacco cigar.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 11:47 AM

While I am itching to guess railroad bonds and swamp land in Florida, I suspect boxjam has it sewn up.

But just in case...

that new awful kind of mosquito

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 11:48 AM

Did I ever tell you about the day I embarrassed myself by posting late, twice?

Hops

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 11:50 AM

Grape vines

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 11:50 AM

pears

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 11:50 AM

barley

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 11:51 AM

plums

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 11:52 AM

sugar cane

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 11:53 AM

soybean

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 11:54 AM

acidophilus cultures

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 11:57 AM

medicinal leeches

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 11:59 AM

puppies

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 12:00 PM

Correction: apparently the playlist (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/DOCUMENT/950206.htm) did not include Queensreich. I hang my head in shame, both at my error and the fact that I probably would have enjoyed hearing G&R's "Paradise City" at 120dB.

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 12:08 PM

cochineal bugs.

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 12:09 PM

It's not an insect. Although there's an insect connection.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 12:17 PM

'shrooms

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 12:20 PM

milkweed

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 12:22 PM

Someday we'll find it, the insect connection,
The lovers, the dreamers and me.

apples?

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 12:29 PM

There's also a well-known nursery rhyme that names this thing.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 12:37 PM

boughs?

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 12:38 PM

curds & whey

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 12:40 PM

mouse tails.

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 12:50 PM

tuffets

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 12:51 PM

silk spiders

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 12:52 PM

spiders?

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 12:52 PM

Think of it as part one of a two-part process in the creation of something valuable.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 12:55 PM

opium poppies
Non-U.S. residence is Emerald City

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 01:24 PM

oysters

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 01:32 PM

crack corn

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 01:37 PM

well done

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 01:38 PM

I agree, but what's the oyster nursery rhyme?

Forget the famous non-U.S. residence...

Posted by: James on May 27, 2005 01:43 PM

I'll also say that boxjam really was quite close at one point -- just one step away from the answer.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 01:45 PM

inch worm.

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 01:59 PM

or itsy-bitsy spider.

Posted by: boxjam on May 27, 2005 02:03 PM

I'll add that the bonus point refers to what was called a "plantation," of these, which -- after their commercial utility didn't pan out -- later became the formal garden of a very famous home.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 02:04 PM

Well, call me confused. I thought "with silver bells, and cockle shells, and pretty maids all in a row" made the case for oysters, step one in producing pearls, and most pearls come from Asia and are seeded, but I didn't see an insect connection unless the domestics were wiped out by sea lice. Now we're back to silk worms having been close.

Earthworms?

Posted by: Jonathan on May 27, 2005 02:18 PM

It's a living thing, but not an animal. However, it is vital in the raising of certain animals for certain purposes.

Posted by: BT on May 27, 2005 07:20 PM

honeybees?

Posted by: art on May 27, 2005 08:44 PM

scratch that, I can't figure out which animals rely on honeybees (uh, bears trained for circus stunts?)

Posted by: art on May 27, 2005 08:46 PM

wait, it's not an insect. So perhaps it is a plant that honeybees like, that makes honey taste so good. um, not alfalfa because that's not going to be cultivated in some way that makes a private residence striking. something from asia. jasmine? i don't even know what that looks like.

Posted by: art on May 27, 2005 08:54 PM

um, but there's no "jasmine" nursery rhyme that I can think of--nor any honeybee one. where's mother goose when you need her?

Posted by: art on May 27, 2005 08:58 PM

gooseberry?

Posted by: boxjam on May 28, 2005 10:10 PM

elderberry? Is that the same thing as gooseberry?

Posted by: boxjam on May 28, 2005 10:10 PM

morning glories?

Posted by: art on May 29, 2005 03:21 AM

sunflowers?

Posted by: art on May 29, 2005 03:24 AM

I shall reveal all tomorrow...

Posted by: BT on May 30, 2005 11:25 PM

clover

Posted by: Jonathan on May 31, 2005 02:54 AM

The answer we were looking for was mulberry trees. Silkworms are fed on mulberry trees, so the various attempts made between the early 1600s all the way through the early 19th century to foster/nurture native English and/or American silk production had mulberry planting as a key element. In the early 19th century, there really was a speculative bubble on live mulberry trees.

The bonus? The large mulberry plantation which failed as a source of silkworm-chow became part of the Buckingham Palace gardens.

The bobblehead goes, in the end, to boxjam, who after all got us to silkworms, and named a number of "berry" items to boot.

Posted by: BT on May 31, 2005 12:33 PM

'scuse me, that should have said "silkworms are fed on mulberry *leaves*"

Posted by: BT on May 31, 2005 12:35 PM

It is worth noting that American monkeys and weasels are said to have been much fitter during the mulberry bush boom years.

Posted by: Scott on May 31, 2005 01:24 PM

well, I'll bee

Posted by: art on May 31, 2005 08:23 PM

Good lord, of course. I even vaguely remember reading about that. The house I grew up in had a mulberry tree. As a kid I used to get red feet from walking near it in berry season (late summer, when I always wandered around barefoot), but I didn't like the berries then - no-one in our family did, apart from my uncle, who would take home buckets of them after visiting. Then on a trip home in my 30s I discovered a taste for them... and then moved out of the country, and my parents moved house. So now I'm doomed to eating mulberries only during trips to France in late summer, and how often is that likely to happen?

Posted by: Rory on June 1, 2005 05:07 AM

Oh, yeah, mulberries. Silk worms eat mulberry. I remembered it as gooseberry.

Monkeys and weasels were also said to have been earlier risers way back when.

Posted by: boxjam on June 1, 2005 04:27 PM

Oh, crap, it was the cobbler's bench, not the metrically similar mulberry bush, around which ran the monkey and the weasel.

Posted by: Scott on June 2, 2005 11:23 AM

No, there are two versions of the monkey and the weasel. I've heard both. And in fact, the cobbler's bench/mulberry bush formulations were debated in an episode of NYPD Blue where Dennis Franz was bugged by his inability to extract a coherent hermeneutic from the song.

Posted by: BT on June 2, 2005 03:41 PM